In an incredible interview with the BBC, the Duke of Sussex also unleashed a string of vicious accusations on his family.

Having’so many problems’ with his family, some of whom’may never forgive’ him for publishing a book, he disclosed that he ‘doesn’t know how long his father has left’ and that he will not bring his wife and kids back to the UK.

The following were the interview’s most inflammatory quotes:

• “He [my father] won’t speak to me because of this security stuff”
• “Some members of my family may never forgive me for writing a book”
• “I don’t know how long he [my father] has left”
• “I can’t see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to the UK at this point”
• “There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family”

In addition, Harry expressed his disappointment at losing his legal struggle over security, calling it a “establishment stitch-up.”

In response , Buckingham Palace said Harry’s security issues had been “examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion.”

Sir Geoffrey Vos, the second-highest ranking judge in England, informed the Duke today that his “grievance” over reduced security had not “transslated into a legal argument.”

And when Harry resigned from his position as a senior royal and left Britain, he decided that the security decision had been a “predictable” and even “sensible” response to Megxit.

He wants’reconciliation’ with the royal family, but he is currently estranged from his father, Harry told the BBC in California on Friday night in a scathing broadside that reopened wounds with the royal family.

“He won’t speak to me because of this security stuff,” the prince said, adding he didn’t know how long the King had left to live.

“There have been so many disagreements between myself and some of my family,” he said, but he had now “forgiven” them.

Even though Harry stated that he wants to make amends, it is known that King Charles is still angry and disappointed with his son.

Speaking to The Sun, a source close to the King said: “What has frustrated and upset him on a more personal level is the Duke’s failure to respect this principle.”

“And for his supporters to suggest that somehow his father doesn’t care about his family, or should step in.”

“He’s been particularly concerned that it has taken considerable resources and cost for the Government to defend their position.”

Harry said he was “let down” and appeared furious, calling his court loss a “good old-fashioned establishment stitch up.” He also accused the Royal Household of having a say in the decision to lower his security.

Asked whether he had asked his father the King to intervene in the dispute over security, Prince Harry said: “I never asked him to intervene – I asked him to step out of the way and let the experts do their jobs.”

“The Ravec committee is an expert committee full of professionals plus the royals.”

He added: “Five years later, every single visit that I do back to the UK has to go through the royal household.”

“My representative on the Ravec committee still to this day is the royal household.”

“That’s not a decision that I choose. I am forced to go through the royal household and accept that they are putting my best interests forward during these conversations and deliberations.”

“So no, I haven’t asked my father to intervene.”

The Duke of Sussex said, “Everything,” in response to a BBC question about what aspects of his present security setup made him feel uneasy.

He continued: “I would not have taken this this far if I did not have compelling evidence of facts that reveal why the decision was made and I am sitting here today talking to you, where we have lost the appeal, but the other side have won in keeping me unsafe, so again there is a lot of question marks that a lot of people will have.”

“I have all of the truth, I have all of the knowledge now, throughout the legal process.”

“I have uncovered my worst fears, and to now know today based on this judgment that there was no legal framework that constrains the decisions of this body Ravec, on which the royal household sit on, and I didn’t know that until this legal process in 2021, one of the first things my lawyer said to me as disclosure started, as this process started, was did you know that the royal household sat on Ravec? , and my jaw hit the floor.”

Harry also made the startling admission that he would not be bringing his family to the UK.  

He explained: “I can’t see a world in which I will be bringing my wife and children back to the UK at this point and the things they are going to miss is everything.”

“I love my country and always have done. Despite what some people in that country have done. So I miss the UK. I miss parts of the UK. Of course I do. I think it’s really quite sad that I won’t be able to show my children my homeland.”

It comes after Harry shockingly lost his fight for taxpayer-funded armed police bodyguards in the UK today, costing him £1.5 million.

In order to effectively dispute the judgement, the Duke of Sussex was informed that his “grievance” over decreased security had not “translated into a legal argument.”

Harry feels that since Megxit five years ago, he has been “singled out” and “badly treated” for “unjustified, inferior treatment.”

His lawyer claimed that the royal’s life was “at stake” because the Met Police had removed their armed escorts while he was in the UK.

When the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) decided that he should be given a different level of protection when in the nation, the California-based royal tried to have his High Court action against the Home Office dismissed.

Ravec’s decision, however, “were taken as an understandable, and perhaps predictable, reaction to the claimant having stepped back from royal duties and having left the UK to live principally overseas,” according to Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, who rendered the decision this afternoon in London.

“These were powerful and moving arguments and that it was plain the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated by the system”, he said.

“But I concluded, having studied the detail, I could not say that the Duke’s sense of grievance translated into a legal argument to challenge RAVEC’s decision.”

Sir Geoffrey said Harry “makes the mistake of confusing superficial analogies” when comparing himself with other VIPs which had ‘added nothing’ to the legal question.

“My conclusion was that the Duke of Sussex’s appeal would be dismissed,” he continued.

This implies that while he, Meghan, Archie, and Lilibet are in the UK, they will not immediately be rehired armed police bodyguards, which are funded by British taxpayers. It makes it increasingly doubtful that the Sussexes will return to Britain.

It is thought that Harry’s decision to continue his legal battle with the Home Office has caused a rift between the King and his youngest son. The Home Secretary is demanding that the duke cover all expenses, which total close to £1.5 million.